Asses Why Was Louis XVI Executed in 1793 essays

Asses Why Was Louis XVI Executed in 1793 essays On January, 21, 1793 King Louis XVI was guillotined, after being tried for treason and being proven guilty. During the reign of Louis XVI France suffered from constant economic troubles; the country was always in debt because of the present (Louis XVI and his family) and previous royal familys frequent spending on war and luxuries, in 1788 there was a terrible harvest leaving almost 80% percent of the population poor, starving and unemployed because of unbalanced social classes. For example; during the American Revolution Louis government gave substantial financial assistance to the Americans. When the Estates General met in May, 1789, the king insisted that it had one purpose: to solve the financial problems of the government. Although his plans did not turn out as he had hoped and the third estate left the Estate General and later became the National Assembly. The National Assembly became a powerful group that achieved many great things for France. There were three main reasons tha t help asses why King Louis XVI was executed in 1793; the Jacobins gained more power, Austria and Prussia threatened to attack France, and the Vendee revolt. The Constitution of 1791 marks the end of the first stage of the revolution, this constitution includes: the legislative assembly, this was a lawmaking group, to vote for representatives you must be a male and a taxpayer, this constitution also gave strong limits to the power of the king. The second stage of the French Revolution is called Radical Times, in these times the extreme revolutionaries, or radicals, grew stronger. The main goal of this group of people was to bring down the monarchy and establish a republic. A group of radicals made a government called; the comune, this group of people took over. One of the first actions that the comune took was to imprison the king and his family. On September, 22, 1792 the newly formed National Convention met, this was the fi...

Free Essays on Till Death Do Us Part

How would you characterize Micah and Rachel’s marriage? What factors can you recognize that may contribute to the quality of their relationship in later adulthood? Although it is quite difficult to characterize a marriage that spanned over 45yrs, based on a short synopsis, Micah and Rachel’s marriage could be characterized as a â€Å"Successful† one. In short, it showed qualities of Strength, Trust/Unity, Devotion and Communication. One can begin to make some assumptions about their relationship based on the Lifespan perspective â€Å"which analyzes the change within people from conception to deathâ€Å" (Byrne, 2004, p3). One example of a normative event in life is the process of aging. If it weren’t for their age/stage, commonly termed later adulthood, Micah and Rachel would not be discussing death nor would they have been able to come to terms with the realities in dealing with death. The stroke has caused them to reevaluate the control they have over their lives. Abraham Maslow’s (1954) humanistic perspective explains that a person’s perception of self is in fact, their reality. (as cited in Byrne, 2004 ). Thus, Micah and Rachel’s goal to be well prepared for end of life issues motivated them to move forward and proceed with certain decisions. Rarely is this common amongst cohorts of younger generations. It is in dealing with Micah’s stroke, a non-normative event in their lives, are the qualities of their marriage made apparent Trust/Unity- With this, it can be assumed that the relationship has grown into a sort of team and is a prime example of their unity in their decision making. The fact that they were able to make decisions together rather than independently regarding the party, the funeral arrangements, and different ways of spending time together, shows the interdependence between the two. The use of the word ‘they’ boldly impacts the reader. Strength- the fact that they were able to make firm stands about their... Free Essays on Till Death Do Us Part Free Essays on Till Death Do Us Part How would you characterize Micah and Rachel’s marriage? What factors can you recognize that may contribute to the quality of their relationship in later adulthood? Although it is quite difficult to characterize a marriage that spanned over 45yrs, based on a short synopsis, Micah and Rachel’s marriage could be characterized as a â€Å"Successful† one. In short, it showed qualities of Strength, Trust/Unity, Devotion and Communication. One can begin to make some assumptions about their relationship based on the Lifespan perspective â€Å"which analyzes the change within people from conception to deathâ€Å" (Byrne, 2004, p3). One example of a normative event in life is the process of aging. If it weren’t for their age/stage, commonly termed later adulthood, Micah and Rachel would not be discussing death nor would they have been able to come to terms with the realities in dealing with death. The stroke has caused them to reevaluate the control they have over their lives. Abraham Maslow’s (1954) humanistic perspective explains that a person’s perception of self is in fact, their reality. (as cited in Byrne, 2004 ). Thus, Micah and Rachel’s goal to be well prepared for end of life issues motivated them to move forward and proceed with certain decisions. Rarely is this common amongst cohorts of younger generations. It is in dealing with Micah’s stroke, a non-normative event in their lives, are the qualities of their marriage made apparent Trust/Unity- With this, it can be assumed that the relationship has grown into a sort of team and is a prime example of their unity in their decision making. The fact that they were able to make decisions together rather than independently regarding the party, the funeral arrangements, and different ways of spending time together, shows the interdependence between the two. The use of the word ‘they’ boldly impacts the reader. Strength- the fact that they were able to make firm stands about their...

Orignial topic - adopting a positive or negative viewpoint Essay - 2

Orignial topic - adopting a positive or negative viewpoint - Essay Example auses major health problems, is more dangerous for the non-smoker than smoking is for the smoker, is most dangerous for children and is an infringement on rights, the right to live. The definition of secondhand smoke is smoke that a person inhales due to someone else’s who is smoking close to them. While some disagree and say that the hazard from second-hand smoke is negligible, others have identified numerous properties of secondhand smoke that make it more than obvious this type of smoke is even more powerful and therefore more harmful than the smoke the smoker themselves is inhaling into their own lungs. When a smoker inhales through a cigarette filter they are getting only about half of the poisons tar and nicotine that are found in a comparable sized amount of secondhand smoke according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Despite the fact they are non-smokers, this same report states that roughly â€Å"3,000 non-smokers a year die from lung cancer caused by secondhand smoke† and another â€Å"37,000 non-smokers a year die from heart disease attributed to secondhand smoke† (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992). These figures are verified by other data of the detrimental effects of secondhand smoke, for example, a study demonstrated that women who did not smoke that were married to heavy smoking men suffered twice the risk of developing lung cancer as compared to women married to non-smoking men. Another study performed on workers such as waitresses and bartenders who are repeatedly exposed for an extended period of time to secondhand smoke experienced a 25-75 percent greater possibility of contracting lung cancer, with the odds becoming proportionately higher with the time employed in these types of places. These are studies on adult lungs. Imagine the damage done to smaller, weaker and less developed more susceptible lungs. â€Å"Children exposed to high levels of secondhand smoke are susceptible to greater instances of bronchitis, pneumonia